Carl Sagan is famous for state there are more star in our Universe than there are grain of moxie on all the beaches on Earth . But is this actually possible ? It ’s an awesome dubiousness — and a capital apology to do some math .
We lie with there are 100 to 400 billion ace in the Milky Way and more than 100 billion galaxies in the Universe — maybe as many as 500 billion . If you multiply star by galaxies , at the low end , you get 10 billion billion stars , or 10 sextillion stars in the Universe . That ’s a 1 followed by 22 cypher . At the high end , it ’s 200 sextillion .
These are mind bogglingly huge numbers . How do they compare to the telephone number of grains of sand on the collective beaches of an integral planet ? This eccentric of grit measures about a half millimeter across .

You could put 20 grain of sand packed in side - by - side to make a centimeter . So 8,000 metric grain could fit in one three-dimensional centimeter . If you took 10 sextillion grain of sand , put them into a ball , it would have a radius of 10.6 kilometers . And for the high end of our appraisal , 200 sextillion , it would be 72 km across . If we had a domain bigger than the Earth , it would be an easy answer , but no such luck . This might be close .
So , is there that much guts on all the beach , everywhere , on this major planet ? You ’d require to figure the average bulk of a sandlike beach and the average amount of the world ’s coastline which are beaches .
I ’m hold out to travel along the estimate and calculations made by Dr. Jason Marshall , aka , the Math Dude . According to Jason , there about 700 trillion cubic metre of beach of Earth , and that forge out to around 5 sextillion grains of sand .

Jason reminds us that his math is a rough estimate , and he could be off by a cistron of 2 either elbow room . So it could be 2.5 sextillion or there could be 10 sextillion grains of gumption on all the man ’s beach .
So , if the modest end estimation for the number of whiz matches the gamey oddment estimate for the number of grains of grit , it ’s the same . But more likely , there are 5 to 10 times more superstar than there are grains of George Sand on all the world ’s beach .
So , there ’s the result . For some “ back of the napkin ” math we can guess that there are more stars in our Universe than there are grain of backbone on all the beach of Earth .

Oh , one more affair . Instead of grains of sand , what about corpuscle ? How enceinte is 10 sextillion atoms ? How vast would something with that monolithic amount of anything be ? Pretty mammoth . Well , relatively at least . 10 sextillion of anything does vocalise like a whole lot .
If you were to make a pile of that many atoms , pretend how big it would be ? It ’d be about four times small than a junk mite . Which mean , a single grain of sand has more atoms than there are star topology in the Universe .
This articleoriginally appearedat Universe Today and is republish here with license .

AstronomySciencestars
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , scientific discipline , and culture news in your inbox day by day .
intelligence from the future , hand over to your present .
You May Also Like











![]()
