Five year ago , Epic Games , the maker of Fortnite , filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple for its in - app purchase policies . Since then , things mostly have n’t act upon out in Epic ’s party favor . But this workweek , a Union evaluator chew up Apple for “ willfully violating ” an early injunction . Coupled with claim that a top Apple executive director lied under oath and a referral for criminal contempt , Epic may have secured a major triumph for developer .
Epic ’s lawsuit stems from its intentionally transgress App Store insurance by offer mobile user a direct payment pick for in - game purchase . This circumvented Apple ’s 30 % commission on in - App Store purchases . In reply , Apple ( and Google , who Epic also action ) remove Fortnite from fluid stores . And thus , Epic officially launched Project Libertyto dismantle Apple ’s monopoly on mobile gaming .
But in 2021 , United States District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Roger largely reign in Apple ’s party favour and evenordered Epic to pay Apple lost revenue . However , she did govern that Apple needed to allow developers employ and notify people in - app of alternate payment option . That is at the center of Gonzalez Rogers’Wednesday rulingcoming down on Apple ’s “ self-willed violation ” of court orders .

According to Gonzalez Rogers , Apple “ retain its anticompetitive demeanour ” after it could n’t get the Supreme Court to strike down her injunction . primary amongst complaint is that Apple imposed a new 27 % fee on developer for purchases outside of the App Store . That ’s alongside its pre - live 30 % commission for in - App Store purchases .
“ Apple seek to maintain a revenue flow worth billions in direct defiance of this tourist court ’s enjoining , ” Gonzalez Rogers wrote . She also stated that Apple “ cognize on the button what it was doing and at every turn chose the mostanticompetitive option . ” ( Emphasis her own . )
Online , Epic ’s Chief Executive Tim Sweeney celebrated the profits , tweeting , “ Apple ’s 15030 % junk fee are now just as dead here in [ the US ] as they are in Europe … Unlawful here , improper there . ”

NO FEES on web dealing . secret plan over for the Apple Tax .
Apple ’s 15 - 30 % debris fees are now just as beat here in the United States of America as they are in Europe under the Digital Markets Act . Unlawful here , unlawful there .
4 year 4 months 17 days.https://t.co/RucrsX7Z4Apic.twitter.com/3kSYnt5pcI

— Tim Sweeney ( @TimSweeneyEpic)April 30 , 2025
In gain to its novel commission , Apple seek to deter customers from using alternate requital methods at all . Perthe New York Times , CEO Tim Cook requested that customer receive a “ scare ” screen saying “ Apple ’s privacy and security standard do not apply to purchase made on the web . ” Whileexecutive Phillip Schiller tried to get Apple to abide by with the court , Tim Cook ignored his advice . Gonzalez Rogers write , “ Cook choose poorly . ”
Gonzalez Rogers also stated that Apple ’s vice president of finance , Alex Roman , “ in a flash lied ” at a May 2024 hearing . During it , Apple tried to “ mislead the Court ” regarding its determination to inaugurate a new charge . When asked , Roman testified that Apple had n’t decide the fee until January 16 , 2024 , but documents show that it was make up one’s mind in July 2023 .

“ Neither Apple , nor its counselor , rectify the , now , obvious lies , ” Gonzalez Rogers wrote . “ They did not seek to withdraw the testimony or have it stricken . ” She has pertain the matter to U.S. District Attorneys to verify if both Roman and Apple should face reprehensible proceeding .
On X , Sweeney gallop Apple a peace of mind proposal . Hewrote , “ If Apple extends the court ’s rubbing - gratuitous , Apple - tax - destitute fabric worldwide , we ’ll return Fortnite to the App Store worldwide and drop current and next litigation on the topic . ”
Apple did not reply to Gizmodo ’s petition for scuttlebutt . It has not issued an official argument regarding the next steps . However , Gonzalez made it clean that this is “ not a talks . ”

“ There are no do - over once a party willfully cut a royal court gild , ” she wrote . “ Time is of the centre . The Court will not tolerate further hold . ”
antitrustAppleEpicMonopoly
Daily Newsletter
Get the dear tech , science , and finish word in your inbox day by day .
News from the time to come , have to your present .
You May Also Like










